Posts Tagged ‘Yahoo’

A #1 Rank in Bing is Better Than Ranking #2 in Google in 2010

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

About a week ago comScore released their qSearch analysis showing how many searches were performed in the U.S. by major search engines for November 2009. Google came out on top of course, but with Bing more than likely powering Yahoo in the near future, an interesting question came up: Is it going to be better to rank #1 in Bing or #2 in Google in 2010?

The ideal situation would land you on top of both search engines, but if you had to pick one, which one would be more beneficial? The decision would vary slightly from industry to industry, but in general, how much traffic would each spot get you?

(Bing + Yahoo) > Google (sort of)

Google powered about 9.5 billion searches in the month of November for the U.S., which amounts to about 2/3 of the total searches performed. Bing had about 10 percent of the market share and Yahoo had 17.5 percent. If you add up Yahoo and Bing’s searches in the U.S. they total about 4 billion, not even half of Google. Combining those numbers with a study done on search engine result page click through rates will give you a good idea on how much traffic each rank in each search engine gives.

When you crunch the current numbers and take into account that Bing will power Yahoo in 2010, the #1 spot in Bing results will net around 2 billion clicks, assuming search numbers stay roughly the same. Using the same math, the #2 spot in Google will net about 1.2 billion clicks. This shows that, in general, a #1 ranking in Bing will be much more effective than a #2 ranking in Google.

SEOs and marketers should take note of this. Much more energy is spent optimizing for Google than any other search engine even though it might be a better idea to focus on Bing very soon. Since all the energy is being focused on Google, it could be simpler to get better rankings in Bing. While Bing may not beat Google anytime soon in market share, there could be a shift in where some SEOs begin spending more of their time.

Google Gains Ground, How Can Bing Beat Them?

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Is the Bing fad already over? Last month showed Yahoo and Bing declining in market share, but is this a hiccup or a trend?

Google gained about 1 percent in market share while Yahoo lost 5 and Bing lost 2 percent, according to an Experian Hitwise report. Bing has only been around a couple of months, and while the initial announcement got some buzz and increased market share for the Microsoft search engine, it’s possible that the new-engine smell is gone.

Google Market Share Domination

It looks like it’s time for Bing to start innovating, or it might settle back down into the small market share it’s had for years. With Yahoo market share also declining, both search engines need to pick up the pace, or combining forces in a partnership is going to scare Google even less than it already is.

Bing has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on marketing since its launch. It’s time for them to realize it’s going to take more than a few commercials to make Bing a successful search engine; they’re going to have to do things better than Google. It isn’t about replicating Google and then marketing better; it’s about being better than Google and marketing better. Powering Yahoo’s search isn’t going to solve these problems, they have to create a product that is distinctly different than Google’s.

Bing has some opportunities to gain ground, but they have to be more aggressive. One area where Bing could capitalize is by buying up news. There has been talk of Bing trying to get News Corp. to deindex from Google, that’s a great start. If Bing could get major news outlets to remove themselves from the Google index, a huge chunk of users would probably move to a search engine where news was searchable.

If that doesn’t work, Bing will have to find something else. It’s about having something useful that Google doesn’t have. It won’t be easy, but innovation is the key to taking down a giant.

Google at 283 Million Searches per Day in July 2009

Friday, August 21st, 2009

Total U.S. searches dipped again in July, with Google retaining the bulk of the queries.

According to the most recent comScore report, total searches in the US were nearly 13.6 billion, and Google accounted for 64.7 percent of those. That means that Google averaged 283 million searches per day throughout July 2009.

Those numbers are down slightly from June.

By comparison, Yahoo averaged 84.5 million searches per day and Bing averaged 38.9 billion searches per day (Bing being part of “Microsoft site”).

The summer months are usually lighter search months, comScore said. What will be very interesting to see is the impact (if any) Google Wave will have on the U.S. search industry.

By: Zack S.

What to Expect Now from Bing, Yahoo and Google

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

global-search-engines

Now that the Microsoft-Yahoo deal is public and the details have been hashed over by blog after blog, the dust is settling, and we are perhaps getting a clearer picture of what to expect in the future.

Bing and Yahoo will keep their own branding, but Yahoo’s search results will be powered by Bing.

Great – but what about Google? The Mountain View-based industry leader was expected (by some) to throw a fit about the union between number 2 Yahoo and number 3 Bing – yet they released a statement basically saying they were intrigued and interested in the partnership. To me it read: “and then there was only one remaining…”

I don’t think Google has anything to worry about from the Yahoo/Microsoft partnership in terms of search engine market share. With Google Voice and Google Wave being the next hot online tools, I don’t see Bing/Yahoo deal snatching away the limelight.

It will be interesting to see what happens in 2010 when we can finally hope to see the results online of the Bing/Yahoo deal. But until then, what can we expect from the search engine rankings?

Well so far – not much.

For all the hubbub about the Bing search engine, it really hasn’t made much of an impact in the search engine industry. Bing merely took over the market share that Live Search and MSN held, and it’s snagged a few tenths of a percentage point from Yahoo and Google.

In fact, in the past 30 days, Google’s U.S. market share has INCREASED, while Bing has DROPPED over two percent! Hmm…

Yahoo has seen a slight increase in U.S. market share over the same time period – suggesting that the two leaders in the industry (Google and Yahoo) aren’t going anywhere any time soon.

It’s going to be a while before we see anything actually happening online with Bing and Yahoo – and even longer before we see any hope for the new deal to claim market share from Google. I wouldn’t hold my breath.

Moment at the Top Short Lived for Bing?

Monday, June 8th, 2009

We wrote last week about Bing jumping past Yahoo and grabbing a large chunk of search engine market share from Google and Yahoo. The big question was whether Microsoft could buy its way to the top, or at least use its deep pockets to pose a legitimate challenge to Google.

Apparently not.

While last Thursday saw Bing gobble up market share, StatCounter shows that Bing has slid drastically since then. At time of this writing, Bing held 5.51 percent of the US market share, compared to 10.94 percent for Yahoo and 81.31 percent for Google. Globally, Google holds a much more commanding lead at 90.27 percent.

So what happened to Bing? Have we seen the initial interest and curiosity wane and reality sink in? Will Microsoft’s reported $80 million to $100 million in ad spending on Bing not have the intended effect?

Bing doesn’t appear to be the next great thing in the search engine industry, but it’s not bad. The expandable content preview boxes are a nice touch, and the “decision engine” does a nice job of offering you related search links.

For example, a search for the singer Sheryl Crow turns up the expected results, but Bing gives you a link list on the side including lyrics, albums, fan club and tickets. Clever, but obviously not enough.

Google has managed to build itself and its name into near synonymy with search. In fact, while writing this post, I was on the Bing page and wanted to search for an article for research. My fingers automatically typed in Google’s URL to perform the search instead of just using Bing. Now that is successful branding.

I still think that Microsoft’s best bet to challenge Google in the search engine and online ad revenue industry is to buy or partner with Yahoo. It may very well still happen, but we’ll have to wait and see.

We’ll keep an eye on the market share numbers for Bing, but I don’t think we’ll see anything like we saw last week.

By: Zack S.

Bing and Google: Can Microsoft Buy Its Way to the Top?

Friday, June 5th, 2009

Google and Microsoft – one is a dominant force in the online search engine and ad revenue market and the other a ubiquitous operating system provider.

Recently Microsoft announced and went live with a new search engine they’re calling a decision engine, Bing. You may have seen Microsoft’s first ad on TV or online in the past few days.

Yesterday Microsoft released their second such ad.

Both are clever ads and very well done, evidence of Microsoft’s deep pockets and the millions budgeted for the Bing ad campaign.

Microsoft’s intent is to grab a larger share of the search engine market than it was able to accomplish with MSN or Live Search.

Whether this will come at the expense of Yahoo or Google is somewhat left to be seen. But we do have some stats from StatCounter that show a jump in US market share for Bing and it surpassing Yahoo for the number two engine.

Simultaneously there is a slight downward trend in Google’s overall US share – so it appears Microsoft may have achieved what it was looking for…so far.

Bing has an advertising campaign behind it rumored to be in the $80 million to $100 million, no small change. It very well may be that the spike in market share is simply curiosity coming from exposure.

Seeing Yahoo get leapfrogged so quickly caught me by surprise some. I know money can buy a lot of things, but in a matter of mere days, Bing grabbed a significant chunk of the search engine market share.

That begs the question: Can Bing hold onto it or will interest subside when the ad campaign ends?

By: Zack S.

Why Microsoft’s Bing Won’t Ring in a New Search Engine Leader

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

Microsoft has officially chosen the name “Bing” for it’s new search engine.

Cheers rise up from the crowds…glitter and confetti fall from the heavens…Microsoft is welcomed as the new leader in online search engines because they turned theirs into a decision engine.

Wait, that’s not happening?

Sure - the general public doesn’t have access to Bing yet. It looks like it’ll be about June 3 before we can “Bing it” instead of just Googling it.

We aren’t going to go over what Bing is. Search Engine Land has already done that extensively, and they’ve done a great job.

Instead, this is a look at what Bing isn’t.

We can state the obvious, just like SEL did: Bing is not a Google killer.

While it’s unlikely that Microsoft will flop like Cuil and Wolfram Alpha have, it’s doubtful the Redmond-based company will gain much on industry leader Google.

Why? Well as Josh Bernoff stated on Adage, Bing has to be better and qualitatively different. From what we’ve seen so far, it isn’t.

There are some nice features in Bing like the IP-based localization of the search results. If you simply did a search for the latest Pixar movie, Bing looks like it will give you the show times for the movie in your area at the top of the results. That’s pretty neat.

Bing also looks like it will include a little more media on the front page of its search engine results page than Google.

Okay…

But will that tear away the Google faithful? Will the reported $80 million marketing campaign do the job? Can they really catch up with Google?

In short, no.

Yahoo will probably fare the worst in terms of search engine market share. Maybe that is Microsoft’s plan. A Microsoft-Yahoo partnership would still probably be the best thing for a real Google competitor.

Aside from people stopping by to give Bing a try, Google will probably remain the main search engine for most users. It helps that Firefox uses Google as the default.

ZDNet did a great article about Bing, including 10 burning questions you might have about the new “decision engine”. The two that jumped out at me are “Is Bing the right brand?” and “Will Bing be differentiated enough to woo new users?” No, and No.

We wrote before that for Microsoft to truly gain market share against Google, they would need to amaze us and come up with something completely revolutionary.

Bing needs to be a fully social media integrated interface, with a search engine built into a much larger online system. Simply rebranding and retooling MSN and Live Search will not do to compete with Google.

Maybe Microsoft is still angling for a partnership or purchase of Yahoo. I know those 850 million cell phone users that Yahoo has access to are still pretty attractive to Microsoft.

I suppose on June 3 or 4, I’ll head over to Bing.com or whatever the final URL will be and play around with Microsoft’s new toy.

Then on June 5 when I’m looking for news about Major League Baseball, I’ll head to Google and get the latest scores.

By: Zack S.

SEO for Bing: Should We Be Preparing for New Algorithms?

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

So guess what – Microsoft is making another run at the search engine industry with its latest product called Bing.

Bing – as in “Bing, and decide”.

Microsoft wants us to make sure that we aren’t confusing Bing with a regular old search engine. No, Bing is a decision engine, says Microsoft.

So where does that leave SEO with Bing? Google is famous for implementing algorithm changes that affect search engine placements – are we going to have to scramble to keep up with this new decision engine?

Yes and no.

MSN and Live Search certainly have an impact in the search engine industry, but not a huge one. Google is the clear king, and even Yahoo currently holds a large edge over Microsoft.

Microsoft has been attempting to buy Yahoo, or at least a part of it, for a while now. They made an offer of $31/share over a year ago, which CEO Jerry Yang turned down.

Yang is now gone as CEO and some of the shareholders of Yahoo (particularly Carl Icahn) are looking at their current $15/share and wondering what could have been. Icahn did end his proxy fight with Yahoo and he is now a member of the board, but it must smart a little bit knowing how much market value has vanished.

Around the same, in August 2008, Microsoft acquired the semantic search engine provider Powerset. They had a technology that attempted to understand the full meaning of the phrases people were typing into the search query.

There has been a lot of speculation that Microsoft is using Bing as a re-branding effort for its Live Search. Microsoft desperately wants and needs to sink its teeth into Google’s market share, but is simply re-branding their search engine going to do the trick?

Well now that Bing is live and we’ve had a chance to play with the new “decision engine”, I think it’s safe to say Google’s market share is probably secure.

Bing has a fun new name, a sleek-looking front page and it appears to index sites at a pretty rapid rate. It can’t hurt to pay attention to what works on Bing and what doesn’t – but don’t sacrifice your ranks on Google and Yahoo for it.

We already know that not all sites rank equally across the various search engines. Bing could turn out to be the next big search engine that we need to focus on as SEOs.

Or…

Microsoft hasn’t gotten where it is by always playing catch-up. When they see something they like, they find a way to buy it, or they do you one-better.

A re-branded Live Search is really going to have to kick up the WOW-factor to gain any market share against Google and Yahoo.

Perhaps one of these two things could be happening here.

I suspect Microsoft would still like to make Yahoo’s search engine its own. Yahoo is the only real competitor to Google, and even that is a stretch to say.

Nonetheless, attaining Yahoo’s 20-ish percent of the search engine market would help Microsoft quickly make up some ground.

Will Yahoo sell?

They very well might if they think Microsoft is coming out with something bigger and better. Why not lock in some financial gains while you can than risk losing market share to the new up and comer?

Maybe they won’t. Cuil was supposed to be the big, bad Google killer and they have flopped. But Cuil isn’t Microsoft and they don’t have the deep pockets the Redmond-based company does.

When Microsoft starts making moves like this with Bing, they may push Yahoo back into negotiations.

Granted, Microsoft isn’t about to admit this could be their plan. Admitting they were still interested in Yahoo, or even parts of Yahoo, would only drive the share price up and end up costing Microsoft more for the purchase.

On the other hand, by feigning a brand new, revitalized decision engine like Bing, Microsoft may knock Yahoo down a peg and force it into selling.

Globally, Yahoo has some 70 partnerships with mobile companies, making it the “default” search engine for roughly 850 million cell phone users. That alone would make a tasty treat for Microsoft to swallow.

Or perhaps Microsoft is looking beyond a mere search engine and it wants to one-up Google.

There’s no doubt about the future role and importance cloud computing will play in business and personal use.

Google has done quite well with its software as a service (SaaS); implementing Google Talk, Google Docs etc on its iGoogle.

Maybe Microsoft is looking for a way to move its next-generation operating system into cyberspace and Bing is simply the first step.

If Microsoft wants to create a full-blown virtual OS, complete with a built-in semantic search, a wiki, a photo/file management system, a voice and video communication system etc, they probably would enjoy some real success against Google. This is purely speculation on my part.

For now we’ll just have to make due with poking around the new Bing decision engine and tinker with our SEO efforts to see what works.

By: Zack S.