Posts Tagged ‘search engines’

How Caffeine Will Change Google in 2010

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Google said they will release Caffeine into their main search engine in the new year. While most people won’t notice much of a difference, those who pay close attention will see that there are some significant changes going on behind the SERPs. The question is: How significant will these changes be for SEOs?

The most significant change Caffeine introduces from an SEO’s point of view is the bigger focus on recent results. In addition to Google rolling out their real-time search results, it also looks like timeliness is going to play a larger role in their regular rankings. Sites that stay updated are going to have a better chance to rank. Social media and news sites also fall into this category, and will most likely be given a ranking bonus. This timeliness in Google’s rankings will be more significant for generic keywords, but it’s something that SEOs should still pay attention to once Google roles out the new updates.

Google Caffeine Changes

One of the more noticeable differences in Caffeine when compared to Google’s current search set-up is speed. Google Caffeine can perform much faster than the current search engine, and while this doesn’t directly affect what SEOs do, it does point to a trend in other changes Google is making. Google seems to be focusing on speed in a lot of different areas, including the rankings in their results. As we move into 2010, it looks like Google will be putting more weight on site speed when ranking sites in their index.

There are going to be some interesting changes to Google in 2010 including Caffeine, real-time results and personalized search. These changes will affect how SEOs do their job, but proper basics are going to remain the same. There’s no reason to go out and change everything you do just because Google is introducing some new things. The best thing to do is wait to see how Google’s changes affect the rankings, and then adapt accordingly.

What to Expect Now from Bing, Yahoo and Google

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

global-search-engines

Now that the Microsoft-Yahoo deal is public and the details have been hashed over by blog after blog, the dust is settling, and we are perhaps getting a clearer picture of what to expect in the future.

Bing and Yahoo will keep their own branding, but Yahoo’s search results will be powered by Bing.

Great – but what about Google? The Mountain View-based industry leader was expected (by some) to throw a fit about the union between number 2 Yahoo and number 3 Bing – yet they released a statement basically saying they were intrigued and interested in the partnership. To me it read: “and then there was only one remaining…”

I don’t think Google has anything to worry about from the Yahoo/Microsoft partnership in terms of search engine market share. With Google Voice and Google Wave being the next hot online tools, I don’t see Bing/Yahoo deal snatching away the limelight.

It will be interesting to see what happens in 2010 when we can finally hope to see the results online of the Bing/Yahoo deal. But until then, what can we expect from the search engine rankings?

Well so far – not much.

For all the hubbub about the Bing search engine, it really hasn’t made much of an impact in the search engine industry. Bing merely took over the market share that Live Search and MSN held, and it’s snagged a few tenths of a percentage point from Yahoo and Google.

In fact, in the past 30 days, Google’s U.S. market share has INCREASED, while Bing has DROPPED over two percent! Hmm…

Yahoo has seen a slight increase in U.S. market share over the same time period – suggesting that the two leaders in the industry (Google and Yahoo) aren’t going anywhere any time soon.

It’s going to be a while before we see anything actually happening online with Bing and Yahoo – and even longer before we see any hope for the new deal to claim market share from Google. I wouldn’t hold my breath.

Microsoft and Yahoo Deal Closer to Reality

Friday, July 17th, 2009

Late yesterday, news emerged that Microsoft and Yahoo were in some pretty legitimate talks for Microsoft to buy Yahoo’s web search business.

Details on the deal were scarce, but the deal is rumored to be in the $3 billion range.

When Microsoft consolidated MSN Search and Live Search at the end of May and launched Bing, tongues were sent wagging about Microsoft’s possible intentions. I suggested that Microsoft may be trying to force Yahoo into a sale, or they may be looking into building their presence in cloud computing.

It looks like maybe Microsoft is trying to do both. Microsoft has been pushing Office 2010 as the next great thing for cloud computing – a free version of Microsoft Office, online.

Now with reports emerging about a Microsoft-Yahoo deal in the works, Microsoft’s true intentions are becoming clear.

By snatching up Yahoo’s share of the search engine market share, Microsoft would hold nearly 30 percent of the US market share. Globally, Microsoft would be positioned with just under 10 percent of the search engine market, compared to Google’s dominant 88 percent.

For now we’ll have to wait and see what happens. It will also be interesting to see what, if any, impact this acquisition would have on Google’s anti-trust case.

By: Zack S.

Moment at the Top Short Lived for Bing?

Monday, June 8th, 2009

We wrote last week about Bing jumping past Yahoo and grabbing a large chunk of search engine market share from Google and Yahoo. The big question was whether Microsoft could buy its way to the top, or at least use its deep pockets to pose a legitimate challenge to Google.

Apparently not.

While last Thursday saw Bing gobble up market share, StatCounter shows that Bing has slid drastically since then. At time of this writing, Bing held 5.51 percent of the US market share, compared to 10.94 percent for Yahoo and 81.31 percent for Google. Globally, Google holds a much more commanding lead at 90.27 percent.

So what happened to Bing? Have we seen the initial interest and curiosity wane and reality sink in? Will Microsoft’s reported $80 million to $100 million in ad spending on Bing not have the intended effect?

Bing doesn’t appear to be the next great thing in the search engine industry, but it’s not bad. The expandable content preview boxes are a nice touch, and the “decision engine” does a nice job of offering you related search links.

For example, a search for the singer Sheryl Crow turns up the expected results, but Bing gives you a link list on the side including lyrics, albums, fan club and tickets. Clever, but obviously not enough.

Google has managed to build itself and its name into near synonymy with search. In fact, while writing this post, I was on the Bing page and wanted to search for an article for research. My fingers automatically typed in Google’s URL to perform the search instead of just using Bing. Now that is successful branding.

I still think that Microsoft’s best bet to challenge Google in the search engine and online ad revenue industry is to buy or partner with Yahoo. It may very well still happen, but we’ll have to wait and see.

We’ll keep an eye on the market share numbers for Bing, but I don’t think we’ll see anything like we saw last week.

By: Zack S.

Would you like some content with your SEO?

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

I spend plenty of time rummaging around the web, reading blog posts, comments, news stories and the like. As such, I come across a lot of content regarding proper SEO and how important each building block is. There is of course design. If you don’t have a easy-to-navigate website, you’ll quickly turn users and crawlers away. Visitors hate to search for your content, and we appreciate it when you have a quick and easy way to return to the home page. It’s not hard to have a decent design, so please - from one reader to another - spend a little time on it!

Link structure is also incredibly important when it comes to SEO. These days more weight is given to sites with many link-backs, but you can be docked on search engines like Google if you have too many internal and outgoing links on your site. The hope of everyone is that many readers visit the site and then post links back to it on their own.

Which leads me to content. Without engaging, interesting, relevant, unique content, your site will struggle to develop and will fail miserably at SEO. To begin with, you want to keep your bounce rate low - keeping people on your site longer than mere seconds is required. Quality content is an easy way to assure that your visitors will stick around, and thus help with SEO.

Search engines like Google and Yahoo also like to see original content. That seems fairly obvious, but as I dig more and more into the blogosphere, I find that many people struggle with this. Simply re-posting content from another site will not help your blog rank with SEO. Give your readers and search engine crawlers something worth while!

That all being said - what other ideas do you have to improve SEO? If you were to hire a professional SEO company, what would you want to see done? Please feel free to leave feedback below!

By: Zack S.