Posts Tagged ‘Microsoft’

Bing Visual Search vs. Google Fast Flip

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

Google Microsoft Cartoon

Whenever a major company introduces a product that could possibly compete with Google, you can bet Google’s going to make sure you hear about something interesting they’re working on as well.

It happened when Microsoft first announced Bing and Google made sure you knew Wave was in the works, and it happened again this week when Bing’s Visual Search was announced and Google brought up their Fast Flip news search.

Google Fast Flip

It seems like Google looks through everything they’re working on, they find the product most similar to what their competitor just released, and talk about it as soon as possible.

Visual Search and Fast Flip look very similar on first glance, but when you look a little deeper, they’re pretty different. When you first look at the two Web sites, they’re both a page full of images that you can click on to get more information, but the similarities stop there.

Fast Flip provides screen caps of articles on Web sites Google’s partners have released. Google already provides ways to introduce readers to news content, but they’re trying to make the experience more visual and magazine-like.

Bing's Visual Search

Bing’s Visual Search is much different. Bing isn’t trying to provide articles on partnered sites in a new way, instead it looks like they are trying to fill a need in search that no one has been successful doing yet. The Visual Search looks like it’s attempting to allow people to find things they’re looking for without knowing what the things are called.

If you’ve ever had something pictured in your head, knew what it looked like, but had no idea what the thing was called, Bing’s Visual Search might be the answer for that particular problem. Instead of having to type in words to find what you’re looking for, you’ll be able to click through images and have a search engine figure out what you’re looking for.

While Fast Flip feels like a novelty that doesn’t provide much value to a user, the Visual Search Bing is working on looks like it has real potential, and it needs to.

It’s good to see Bing coming out with new additions to the search engine, but it still has a long way to go before it’s a real competitor with Google. The Yahoo partnership and Visual Search are a good start, and they’ll need to keep it up to compete.

What to Expect Now from Bing, Yahoo and Google

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

global-search-engines

Now that the Microsoft-Yahoo deal is public and the details have been hashed over by blog after blog, the dust is settling, and we are perhaps getting a clearer picture of what to expect in the future.

Bing and Yahoo will keep their own branding, but Yahoo’s search results will be powered by Bing.

Great – but what about Google? The Mountain View-based industry leader was expected (by some) to throw a fit about the union between number 2 Yahoo and number 3 Bing – yet they released a statement basically saying they were intrigued and interested in the partnership. To me it read: “and then there was only one remaining…”

I don’t think Google has anything to worry about from the Yahoo/Microsoft partnership in terms of search engine market share. With Google Voice and Google Wave being the next hot online tools, I don’t see Bing/Yahoo deal snatching away the limelight.

It will be interesting to see what happens in 2010 when we can finally hope to see the results online of the Bing/Yahoo deal. But until then, what can we expect from the search engine rankings?

Well so far – not much.

For all the hubbub about the Bing search engine, it really hasn’t made much of an impact in the search engine industry. Bing merely took over the market share that Live Search and MSN held, and it’s snagged a few tenths of a percentage point from Yahoo and Google.

In fact, in the past 30 days, Google’s U.S. market share has INCREASED, while Bing has DROPPED over two percent! Hmm…

Yahoo has seen a slight increase in U.S. market share over the same time period – suggesting that the two leaders in the industry (Google and Yahoo) aren’t going anywhere any time soon.

It’s going to be a while before we see anything actually happening online with Bing and Yahoo – and even longer before we see any hope for the new deal to claim market share from Google. I wouldn’t hold my breath.

It Turns Out Bing Didn’t Splash the Pond Much

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

bing-logo1google_logo

Because this company is involved with SEO, we pay close attention to what’s going on in the search engine industry. Everyone knows Google reigns supreme, but Bing has drawn a lot of attention and made a lot of noise for itself.

Meanwhile there’s Yahoo, AOL, Ask, Lycos, and a whole slew of others…from Altavista to Zapmeta.

I’ll admit this post was spurred by the fact that I’m tired of hearing about Bing. Microsoft has done a nice job with re-branding Live and MSN Search and I truly enjoy the home page for Bing.

But many Web sites have written articles about Bing overtaking Yahoo (officially 4 times in the past 51 days), that I felt obligated to clarify the status of Google -> Yahoo -> Bing -> AOL -> Others.

It has been 51 days since Bing officially went live on June 1, 2009. The average daily U.S. search engine market share for the top four is as follows:


Google: 78.32 percent

Yahoo: 10.98 percent

Bing: 8.44 percent

AOL: 1.27 percent


Standing alone, those number really don’t tell us too much about Microsoft’s search engine and it’s relation to everyone else. So I looked at the 51 days preceding Bing’s launch as well.

For the 51 days leading up to June 1, I combined Microsoft’s two search engines (Live and MSN) and compared that total to the other top three.


Google: 78.86 percent

Yahoo: 11.07 percent

Live + MSN: 7.57 percent

AOL: 1.35 percent


There was only one day I could find prior to June 4 where Microsoft’s offerings beat out Yahoo for number two in the U.S and that was May 28 – the day the news broke about Bing going live in a few days.

So while we can congratulate Microsoft on putting together a very nice looking engine, and providing quick, accurate results, there really hasn’t been too much of a change overall.

Yes, every tenth of a percentage point counts – particularly for Yahoo, who is tenaciously holding onto its number two ranking. But Bing’s appearance online hasn’t exactly sent shockwaves across the industry.

It’s only been 51 days, so much is left to be seen – but we can quit it with the “Bing will become the next Google” garbage. It isn’t going to happen.

I still kind of think that Microsoft is just looking for a way to force Yahoo to sell.

By: Zack S.

The World’s Top 25 Communicators Shun Twitter

Friday, July 10th, 2009

twitter_fail_whale_wallpaper

Last week PRWeek, one of the leading public relations publications, released a “power list” of the top 25 professional communicators.

The companies represented by the 25 were spread across a wide range of industries – from General Electric to IBM to Waggener Edstrom Worldwide. They are all major players in their respective industries, and each undoubtedly has a team or two (or more) of marketers, public relations experts and communication specialists.

But with titles like Vice President of Communication, Ford Motor Company, you’d think Mr. Ray Day might like to stay plugged in to what was being said about the company.

Right?

Well I did some research and found that a disturbingly low percentage of the “top 25 communicators” had a presence on Twitter. [Note: I’m referring to a visible presence. They may well have a username that isn’t easily searchable by a name or company search]

In fact, only eight percent (that’s two people) on PRWeek’s list were on Twitter. An astounding 44 percent of the companies that these people represented weren’t on Twitter either!

Maybe I’m simply too “new-school”, but I was very surprised to not find FedEx on the microblogging site. It seems to me like that would be a great avenue to connect with clients…you know – field complaints, handle inquiries, and direct traffic to the homepage?

So without further ado, I give you the “25 top communicators” as rated by PRWeek:

Name on Twitter? Company on Twitter?

1. Harris Diamond,CEO
Weber Shandwick Worldwide
and IPG’s Constituency
Management Group.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Yes. (@WSUSA) – 623 followers, 85
updates. +4 other accounts like
@WSCanada.

2. Richard Edelman, worldwide
president and CEO, Edelman.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Yes. (@EdelmanMIA) – 985 followers,
371 updates. +5 other accounts like
@Edelman_India

3. Charlotte Otto,
chief global external relations officer,
Proctor and Gamble.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Yes. (@PGNewsUS) – 523 followers,
0 following, 44 updates.

4. Leslie Dach, EVP, corporate
affairs and government relations,
Wal-Mart.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Not really. There is @RVwalmart and
@WMsoundcheck, but not a true Wal-Mart
account.

5. Jon Iwata, VP, marketing and
communications, IBM. On Twitter –
@coastw – 449 followers, 49
updates.

Company?
Yes. (@ibmdesign) – 3705 followers,
832 updates. + at least 20 more accounts
like @ibm4bloggers.

6. Robert Gibbs, White House
Press Secretary.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Yes. (@whitehouse) – 646,970 followers,
259 updates. +1 @WhiteHouse_blog and
@BarackObama.

7. Sally Susman, SVP and chief
communications officer, Pfizer.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Nothing official.

8. Ray Day, VP, communications,
Ford Motor Company. Not found
on Twitter.

Company?
Yes (@Ford) – 10,476 followers, 1,594
updates, 10,014 following. Managed by
Sotty Monty, head of Ford social media.
+6 other accounts like @FordCustService

9. Ken Cohen, VP, public affairs,
ExxonMobil.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Not found on Twitter.

10. Mark Penn, CEO,
Burson-Marsteller
On Twitter - @Mark_Penn – 166
followers, 24 updates.

Company?
Not found on Twitter.

11. Bill Margaritis, SVP, global
comms and IR, FedEx.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Not found on Twitter.

12. Dave Senay, CEO,
Fleishman-Hillard.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Yes. (@Fleishman) – 1713 followers, 49
updates. + individual employee accounts
like @RachelleLacroix.

13. Gary Sheffer, executive director,
comms and public affairs, GE.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Yes. (@GE_Reports) – 2843 followers,
474 updates, 2225 following. + at least 2
more accounts like @GETech_Infra.

14. Rachel Whetstone, VP, public
policy and comms, Google.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Yes. (@google) – 1,097,659 followers,
488 updates. +at least 16 more accounts
like @ChromeBrowser.

15. Jack Daly, SVP of corporate
relations, McDonald’s.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
No. But there are localized accounts like
@SanDiegoMcDonalds (607 followers) and
@McDonaldsBrazil (548 followers).

16. Ray Kotcher, CEO, Ketchum.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Not found on Twitter. However, Pamela Rocco
Von Lehmdem
, an SVP can be found, if you
search really long and hard.

17. Ray Jordan, VP of public affairs
and corporate comms,
Johnson and Johnson.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Not found on Twitter.

18. Simon Sproule, VP, corporate
comms, Microsoft.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Yes, broken into segments like
@MSWindows (27,631 followers
1,099 updates, 27,029 following) and @bing.

19. Julie Hamp, SVP of corporate
communications, PepsiCo.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Yes (@pepsico) – 2668 followers,
1,080 updates, 1,414 following

20. Joele Frank, managing partner,
Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Not found on Twitter.

21. Maril MacDonald, CEO,
Gagen MacDonald.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Not found on Twitter.

22. Steve Lipin, senior partner,
Brunswick Group.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Not found on Twitter.

23. Joseph Evangelisti, managing
director, corporate comms,
JPMorgan Chase.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Yes (@JPM_News) – 590 followers, 289
updates.

24. Margery Kraus, CEO, APCO
Worldwide.
Not found on Twitter.

Company?
Yes (@APCOJobs) – 494 followers, 74
updates, 706 following.

25. Melissa Waggener Zorkin, CEO,
president, and founder,
Waggener Edstrom Worldwide.
Nothing that appears legitimate on Twitter.

Company?
Sort of. (@WaggedHK) – their Hong Kong
branch. 204 followers, 4 updates,
217 following.


Congratulations to Jon Iwata and Mark Penn. They’re the only two that could be found on Twitter.

So why is that? Is it because these C-level executives are simply too busy to spend time on Twitter? Is it because they have squadrons of employees who manage the accounts for them?

Or is it because no one on the list is under the age of 35?

There’s no denying that younger demographics tend to be early adopters of new social networks much sooner than their older counterparts.

After all, Quantcast statistics show that the main age demographic for Twitter users is 18-34. But maybe it’s more than that.

I’m not suggesting that the people on this list aren’t excellent at their jobs. A full-scale marketing/PR/communications plan for a company the size of JPMorgan or Johnson and Johnson goes far, far beyond little ‘ol Twitter.

But Twitter has proven itself to be a valuable listening tool for companies who DO adopt the service. I’ve read a lot of positive news about @SouthwestAir and how they’ve managed customer relations on Twitter. Why can’t McDonald’s do the same?

In fact, I would think McDonald’s would be a Twitter power user by now – tweeting to its followers about new meal deals, sharing it’s latest advertising videos on YouTube, and directing traffic to its homepage.

At the very least, I would think Jack Daly would want to keep an open channel for communication on Twitter and listen to what was being said.

The same goes for companies like Johnson and Johnson. They could monitor trends about people complaining about cold and flu symptoms. “What are people saying about how they feel?” “How can we use this information to make better products, better advertising and a better company?”

Granted, that shouldn’t fall on Ray Jordan to actively monitor what Sally SoreNose is saying on a daily basis – but SOMEONE should be listening!

As far as the lack of presence on Twitter for these executives…It’s my opinion that they should have an account (that is easily found) if ONLY because someone may be looking for them someday and have a question about the company.

At the very least, they would be able to redirect the person to the proper information source.

Who knows…maybe Pfizer would want to monitor tweets like this one to gauge public sentiment. (By the way - congratulations to Ford, GE, Microsoft, Pepsi, APCO Worldwide and Waggener Edstrom. They’re the only ones who were following a respectable number in proportion to their followers.)

pfizer-tweet

Or maybe not. If it were my communications strategy, I’d at least have someone listening in.

By: Zack S.

Moment at the Top Short Lived for Bing?

Monday, June 8th, 2009

We wrote last week about Bing jumping past Yahoo and grabbing a large chunk of search engine market share from Google and Yahoo. The big question was whether Microsoft could buy its way to the top, or at least use its deep pockets to pose a legitimate challenge to Google.

Apparently not.

While last Thursday saw Bing gobble up market share, StatCounter shows that Bing has slid drastically since then. At time of this writing, Bing held 5.51 percent of the US market share, compared to 10.94 percent for Yahoo and 81.31 percent for Google. Globally, Google holds a much more commanding lead at 90.27 percent.

So what happened to Bing? Have we seen the initial interest and curiosity wane and reality sink in? Will Microsoft’s reported $80 million to $100 million in ad spending on Bing not have the intended effect?

Bing doesn’t appear to be the next great thing in the search engine industry, but it’s not bad. The expandable content preview boxes are a nice touch, and the “decision engine” does a nice job of offering you related search links.

For example, a search for the singer Sheryl Crow turns up the expected results, but Bing gives you a link list on the side including lyrics, albums, fan club and tickets. Clever, but obviously not enough.

Google has managed to build itself and its name into near synonymy with search. In fact, while writing this post, I was on the Bing page and wanted to search for an article for research. My fingers automatically typed in Google’s URL to perform the search instead of just using Bing. Now that is successful branding.

I still think that Microsoft’s best bet to challenge Google in the search engine and online ad revenue industry is to buy or partner with Yahoo. It may very well still happen, but we’ll have to wait and see.

We’ll keep an eye on the market share numbers for Bing, but I don’t think we’ll see anything like we saw last week.

By: Zack S.

Bing and Google: Can Microsoft Buy Its Way to the Top?

Friday, June 5th, 2009

Google and Microsoft – one is a dominant force in the online search engine and ad revenue market and the other a ubiquitous operating system provider.

Recently Microsoft announced and went live with a new search engine they’re calling a decision engine, Bing. You may have seen Microsoft’s first ad on TV or online in the past few days.

Yesterday Microsoft released their second such ad.

Both are clever ads and very well done, evidence of Microsoft’s deep pockets and the millions budgeted for the Bing ad campaign.

Microsoft’s intent is to grab a larger share of the search engine market than it was able to accomplish with MSN or Live Search.

Whether this will come at the expense of Yahoo or Google is somewhat left to be seen. But we do have some stats from StatCounter that show a jump in US market share for Bing and it surpassing Yahoo for the number two engine.

Simultaneously there is a slight downward trend in Google’s overall US share – so it appears Microsoft may have achieved what it was looking for…so far.

Bing has an advertising campaign behind it rumored to be in the $80 million to $100 million, no small change. It very well may be that the spike in market share is simply curiosity coming from exposure.

Seeing Yahoo get leapfrogged so quickly caught me by surprise some. I know money can buy a lot of things, but in a matter of mere days, Bing grabbed a significant chunk of the search engine market share.

That begs the question: Can Bing hold onto it or will interest subside when the ad campaign ends?

By: Zack S.

SEO for Bing: Should We Be Preparing for New Algorithms?

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

So guess what – Microsoft is making another run at the search engine industry with its latest product called Bing.

Bing – as in “Bing, and decide”.

Microsoft wants us to make sure that we aren’t confusing Bing with a regular old search engine. No, Bing is a decision engine, says Microsoft.

So where does that leave SEO with Bing? Google is famous for implementing algorithm changes that affect search engine placements – are we going to have to scramble to keep up with this new decision engine?

Yes and no.

MSN and Live Search certainly have an impact in the search engine industry, but not a huge one. Google is the clear king, and even Yahoo currently holds a large edge over Microsoft.

Microsoft has been attempting to buy Yahoo, or at least a part of it, for a while now. They made an offer of $31/share over a year ago, which CEO Jerry Yang turned down.

Yang is now gone as CEO and some of the shareholders of Yahoo (particularly Carl Icahn) are looking at their current $15/share and wondering what could have been. Icahn did end his proxy fight with Yahoo and he is now a member of the board, but it must smart a little bit knowing how much market value has vanished.

Around the same, in August 2008, Microsoft acquired the semantic search engine provider Powerset. They had a technology that attempted to understand the full meaning of the phrases people were typing into the search query.

There has been a lot of speculation that Microsoft is using Bing as a re-branding effort for its Live Search. Microsoft desperately wants and needs to sink its teeth into Google’s market share, but is simply re-branding their search engine going to do the trick?

Well now that Bing is live and we’ve had a chance to play with the new “decision engine”, I think it’s safe to say Google’s market share is probably secure.

Bing has a fun new name, a sleek-looking front page and it appears to index sites at a pretty rapid rate. It can’t hurt to pay attention to what works on Bing and what doesn’t – but don’t sacrifice your ranks on Google and Yahoo for it.

We already know that not all sites rank equally across the various search engines. Bing could turn out to be the next big search engine that we need to focus on as SEOs.

Or…

Microsoft hasn’t gotten where it is by always playing catch-up. When they see something they like, they find a way to buy it, or they do you one-better.

A re-branded Live Search is really going to have to kick up the WOW-factor to gain any market share against Google and Yahoo.

Perhaps one of these two things could be happening here.

I suspect Microsoft would still like to make Yahoo’s search engine its own. Yahoo is the only real competitor to Google, and even that is a stretch to say.

Nonetheless, attaining Yahoo’s 20-ish percent of the search engine market would help Microsoft quickly make up some ground.

Will Yahoo sell?

They very well might if they think Microsoft is coming out with something bigger and better. Why not lock in some financial gains while you can than risk losing market share to the new up and comer?

Maybe they won’t. Cuil was supposed to be the big, bad Google killer and they have flopped. But Cuil isn’t Microsoft and they don’t have the deep pockets the Redmond-based company does.

When Microsoft starts making moves like this with Bing, they may push Yahoo back into negotiations.

Granted, Microsoft isn’t about to admit this could be their plan. Admitting they were still interested in Yahoo, or even parts of Yahoo, would only drive the share price up and end up costing Microsoft more for the purchase.

On the other hand, by feigning a brand new, revitalized decision engine like Bing, Microsoft may knock Yahoo down a peg and force it into selling.

Globally, Yahoo has some 70 partnerships with mobile companies, making it the “default” search engine for roughly 850 million cell phone users. That alone would make a tasty treat for Microsoft to swallow.

Or perhaps Microsoft is looking beyond a mere search engine and it wants to one-up Google.

There’s no doubt about the future role and importance cloud computing will play in business and personal use.

Google has done quite well with its software as a service (SaaS); implementing Google Talk, Google Docs etc on its iGoogle.

Maybe Microsoft is looking for a way to move its next-generation operating system into cyberspace and Bing is simply the first step.

If Microsoft wants to create a full-blown virtual OS, complete with a built-in semantic search, a wiki, a photo/file management system, a voice and video communication system etc, they probably would enjoy some real success against Google. This is purely speculation on my part.

For now we’ll just have to make due with poking around the new Bing decision engine and tinker with our SEO efforts to see what works.

By: Zack S.