Archive for the ‘Blog Posts’ Category

How Google Buzz Can Be Used For Business

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Google Buzz has several similarities when it’s compared to other social networking platforms, but it also has some new innovations marketers should pay attention to. If you only apply the standard techniques of social media marketing to Buzz, you could be missing out on some potential gains and reputation management issues.

Google Buzz Logo

The geolocation feature is one of the most important things in Buzz that a business with a physical address can pay attention to. Like Twitter or Facebook, Buzz users can post status updates of what they’re doing and where they’re going. The difference with Buzz is that the user’s mobile device can automatically locate them via GPS and post their location into their status updates. This means if someone is eating at your restaurant or shopping at your store and getting bad service, they can post that the service is bad and Buzz will know exactly where the user was when it was posted.

This goes hand-in-hand with a feature that allows people to see what is being buzzed around them. If users are looking at Buzz to see what’s going on around them and they see someone complaining about your business, they are much less likely to visit your establishment. Businesses should keep track of these types of buzzes so they can comment on the status update of the complaining user or contact the user and try to resolve the issue. Resolving the issue could result in the user posting a new message about how helpful you were.

In addition to nearby users being able to see buzzes about your business, Google said at the launch event that those buzzes can also show up on the Google profile for your company. This can be good or bad, but either way it’s always a good idea to stay on top of what is being said and address any issues that may arise.

Google Buzz Mobile Geolocation

Buzz hasn’t said exactly what their model for businesses is going to be, but if it turns out to be anything like Facebook’s, then it would be a good idea to start thinking of a strategy for getting quality followers. This is where some of the older social media marketing methods come in handy. Eventually, there will probably be a way for businesses to have official Buzz profiles, and when that happens, it’ll be a great way for businesses to market on the web. Just like Twitter or Facebook, the more followers you have reading your posts, the more exposure you get for your business. The only difference with Buzz is that posts can be reported as spam and users can leave other kinds of feedback, so when you post to your followers on Buzz, make sure it’s good.

Don’t think that just because Buzz is new no one is using it. Google has made it very easy for users to get started with the product, and a decent number of people are already using it. Within a week, some people already had over 5,000 followers, and that number is going to keep increasing. Getting on the ground floor of Google’s social networking platform is something all businesses should look into; it has the potential to make a huge difference for businesses and thier reputations.

The Relationship Between Code Validation and SEO

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Creating W3C valid websites should be the goal of every Web technician. Valid websites are consistent across browsers, forward compatible, and cleanly presented to both spiders and accessibility programs such as text-to-speech readers (the latter being a legal requirement in the UK). Valid sites are also less likely to break in mobile devices due to quirks of the particular mobile browser. The question many people are asking, however, is whether valid code matters to search engine rankings.

USASEOPros W3C Validation

Currently, Google does not seem to factor W3C valid code directly into its ranking algorithm; even Google’s pages themselves are not 100 percent valid. However, some speculate that this may change in the future as Google continually looks for more ways to determine a site’s credibility. When it comes to changes in the algorithm, it never hurts to be prepared.

Although validation itself does not appear to be an algorithmic factor, it can still affect a page’s rankings in indirect ways. Perhaps the most critical of these is that, while the majority of validation errors are not deadly, some can cause a site to be misunderstood or even skipped entirely by search engine robots. These dangerous errors can include incorrect doctype declaration, unescaped entities, and improperly closed HTML tags.

If a site is not skipped over completely, invalid code still has less of a chance to be understood in its proper context. Semantic design is becoming more important as search engine algorithms grow in intelligence. Take as one example Google Squared, Google’s newest attempt at intelligently displaying search result information. Rather than simply displaying pages matching keywords in a long list, the engine crawls pages to pull information suitable for display in a tabular format. Even for traditional search engines, however, more easily understood content has a greater likelihood of appearing in organic results.

W3C validation also encourages the proper use of tags like image alt attributes. Running a validation check on a site will quickly reveal omissions of these tags. Since using them properly can be important to SEO, this is one case when being W3C compliant could have a direct positive effect on rankings.

There are many arguments for creating W3C valid websites that have nothing to do with SEO, but there are also plenty of strictly SEO reasons to comply with current Web standards. While W3C invalid sites will not be immediately booted from major search engines, avoiding errors in coding can prevent errors in crawling, allow more intelligent indexing, and cause more of a site’s actual content to be indexed. When giving such care to every other detail of a site, it only makes sense for the SEO to pay attention to validation standards as well.

Mobile Optimization and Google’s Focus on Phones

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

With the recent release of Google’s Nexus One phone, the company also mentioned that their line of mobile devices is just getting started. This shows one of the most important trends happening on the Web, and website owners need to take notice if they haven’t already.

To say mobile search is the wave of the future is incorrect; mobile search is the wave of the now. The number of mobile searches went up roughly 500 percent in the last year, and it isn’t going to slow down any time soon. Mobile search is here to stay, and if you have a website that isn’t adapting to the changes yet, it’s time for some modifications.

Google Nexus One Phone

Google’s motto for their new device is “Web meets phone.” This motto is true for more than just the Nexus One, almost any new phone that comes out is going to be able to use the Web. If a site is still designed to be exclusively viewed on a computer monitor, it’s not going to be as successful as a site that meets the needs of those looking on their phones.

Phones are getting more sophisticated and they can now see websites in the same format a computer would display them in, but there’s still a few things to keep in mind to make sure your site works properly on phones.

One of the most important things to do is make sure your site loads quickly. Eliminate all unnecessary bytes to optimize your site for speed. This will allow your site to load faster on phones, which usually have slower Internet speeds than computers. In addition to site speed being useful when optimizing your site for mobile devices, Google has also hinted that speed is going to become a more important ranking factor. Perhaps Google is giving more weight to site speed, because so many sites are now viewed on phones.

Also make sure to get rid of any unnecessary apps and formats that might not show up correctly on a mobile device. Flash is starting to work on some phones, but most aren’t there yet and might not be for some time.

All it takes is a couple steps to make sure things run well when viewed on today’s mobile devices, and if you don’t make sure your website works well, you might be missing out on nice chunk of business.

How Caffeine Will Change Google in 2010

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Google said they will release Caffeine into their main search engine in the new year. While most people won’t notice much of a difference, those who pay close attention will see that there are some significant changes going on behind the SERPs. The question is: How significant will these changes be for SEOs?

The most significant change Caffeine introduces from an SEO’s point of view is the bigger focus on recent results. In addition to Google rolling out their real-time search results, it also looks like timeliness is going to play a larger role in their regular rankings. Sites that stay updated are going to have a better chance to rank. Social media and news sites also fall into this category, and will most likely be given a ranking bonus. This timeliness in Google’s rankings will be more significant for generic keywords, but it’s something that SEOs should still pay attention to once Google roles out the new updates.

Google Caffeine Changes

One of the more noticeable differences in Caffeine when compared to Google’s current search set-up is speed. Google Caffeine can perform much faster than the current search engine, and while this doesn’t directly affect what SEOs do, it does point to a trend in other changes Google is making. Google seems to be focusing on speed in a lot of different areas, including the rankings in their results. As we move into 2010, it looks like Google will be putting more weight on site speed when ranking sites in their index.

There are going to be some interesting changes to Google in 2010 including Caffeine, real-time results and personalized search. These changes will affect how SEOs do their job, but proper basics are going to remain the same. There’s no reason to go out and change everything you do just because Google is introducing some new things. The best thing to do is wait to see how Google’s changes affect the rankings, and then adapt accordingly.

A #1 Rank in Bing is Better Than Ranking #2 in Google in 2010

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

About a week ago comScore released their qSearch analysis showing how many searches were performed in the U.S. by major search engines for November 2009. Google came out on top of course, but with Bing more than likely powering Yahoo in the near future, an interesting question came up: Is it going to be better to rank #1 in Bing or #2 in Google in 2010?

The ideal situation would land you on top of both search engines, but if you had to pick one, which one would be more beneficial? The decision would vary slightly from industry to industry, but in general, how much traffic would each spot get you?

(Bing + Yahoo) > Google (sort of)

Google powered about 9.5 billion searches in the month of November for the U.S., which amounts to about 2/3 of the total searches performed. Bing had about 10 percent of the market share and Yahoo had 17.5 percent. If you add up Yahoo and Bing’s searches in the U.S. they total about 4 billion, not even half of Google. Combining those numbers with a study done on search engine result page click through rates will give you a good idea on how much traffic each rank in each search engine gives.

When you crunch the current numbers and take into account that Bing will power Yahoo in 2010, the #1 spot in Bing results will net around 2 billion clicks, assuming search numbers stay roughly the same. Using the same math, the #2 spot in Google will net about 1.2 billion clicks. This shows that, in general, a #1 ranking in Bing will be much more effective than a #2 ranking in Google.

SEOs and marketers should take note of this. Much more energy is spent optimizing for Google than any other search engine even though it might be a better idea to focus on Bing very soon. Since all the energy is being focused on Google, it could be simpler to get better rankings in Bing. While Bing may not beat Google anytime soon in market share, there could be a shift in where some SEOs begin spending more of their time.

Google Gains Ground, How Can Bing Beat Them?

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Is the Bing fad already over? Last month showed Yahoo and Bing declining in market share, but is this a hiccup or a trend?

Google gained about 1 percent in market share while Yahoo lost 5 and Bing lost 2 percent, according to an Experian Hitwise report. Bing has only been around a couple of months, and while the initial announcement got some buzz and increased market share for the Microsoft search engine, it’s possible that the new-engine smell is gone.

Google Market Share Domination

It looks like it’s time for Bing to start innovating, or it might settle back down into the small market share it’s had for years. With Yahoo market share also declining, both search engines need to pick up the pace, or combining forces in a partnership is going to scare Google even less than it already is.

Bing has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on marketing since its launch. It’s time for them to realize it’s going to take more than a few commercials to make Bing a successful search engine; they’re going to have to do things better than Google. It isn’t about replicating Google and then marketing better; it’s about being better than Google and marketing better. Powering Yahoo’s search isn’t going to solve these problems, they have to create a product that is distinctly different than Google’s.

Bing has some opportunities to gain ground, but they have to be more aggressive. One area where Bing could capitalize is by buying up news. There has been talk of Bing trying to get News Corp. to deindex from Google, that’s a great start. If Bing could get major news outlets to remove themselves from the Google index, a huge chunk of users would probably move to a search engine where news was searchable.

If that doesn’t work, Bing will have to find something else. It’s about having something useful that Google doesn’t have. It won’t be easy, but innovation is the key to taking down a giant.

Google Expands Personalized Search, SEOs Have Complaints

Monday, December 7th, 2009

Members of the SEO community are beginning to complain about Google’s recent announcement that they’re expanding personalized search so it works whether or not the user is logged in. This change to personalized search means SEO as we know it is completely destroyed. Google has managed to single-handedly ruin our industry with this one simple change. All of the research and strategies that have been effective for years will no longer work, and everyone who calls themselves an SEO should start looking for work in another industry, right?

For some reason, a lot of SEOs are drama queens who freak out every time Google decides to alter their search engine. This change to personalized search is definitely something to look into, but it’s not going to be the game changer many are making it out to be.

Personalzed Google Search

While some of the rankings in searches will be altered from user to user, the majority of results are still going to show up in relatively the same place. All you need to do is use the personalized search Google has for those who are logged in to see how results will be affected when the change takes place. After using personalized search for a while, it’s easy to see how Google alters results, and it isn’t all that much, especially when it’s a search the user hasn’t performed before.

This change to Google is more annoying to SEOs than detrimental. It’s going to be more of a hassle now to check baseline rankings for keywords, but it isn’t that big of deal. It’s also going to be annoying when dealing with the customers who don’t realize personalized search is turned on in their browser. Now that personalized search will be turned on in all browsers by default, SEOs can expect more clients to call in complaining about ranks, because the rankings on their computers have been messed up by them researching the competition.

From an SEO standpoint, no one should be too concerned with the changes that are coming out of Google right now. If you’re building strong sites, they’ll continue to show up in the SERPs. While SEOs are drama queens, they also have a great ability to adapt to whatever search engines throw at them. SEO isn’t going anywhere.

An Internet Marketing Mistake Companies Can Learn From

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

Major brands are beginning to jump on the social networking bandwagon, but it seems like some of them may have missed a couple of steps during the leap. While most brands can benefit from social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook, there are other elements of online marketing that companies should be taking advantage of as well.

Let’s use Pizza Hut as an example. The company recently hired a full-time tweeter to manage the social media aspects of the brand. Focusing some energy on social media is fine, but after scratching the surface of Pizza Hut’s Internet marketing campaign, it’s easy to see that they should be spending some more energy on SEO.

Pizza Hut Pie

As sales continue to drop at Pizza Hut restaurants around the U.S., the company is using social media and value menu promotions to try and get sales back up. These strategies may increase sales a bit, but the company is missing a golden opportunity to increase sales through their Web site. The Pizza Hut Web site allows customers to sign up and order food to be delivered without calling the restaurant directly. If they focused more on SEO, they’d be able to drive more potential customers to their site and get them to order.

Pizza Hut has a respectable ranking for “pizza” on Google as the second result, but they are below Domino’s. It’s when you look into some other pizza keywords that you see Pizza Hut begin to seriously struggle. One of the highest search volume keywords for pizza is “pizza coupons”, which Pizza Hut isn’t on the first page for (although Domino’s is). If Pizza Hut is promoting a value menu, it’d make sense for them to focus on “pizza coupons” as a keyword to get traffic to their site from customers who are looking for good deals on pizza.

Pizza Keyword Search Volume

Another high-volume keyword Googlers type in is “pizza restaurants.” Common sense suggests that at least some people who type in this term are looking for a pizza place to order from. Unfortunately, Pizza Hut is nowhere to be found on the first page. Papa John’s the first result and Domino’s is in the sponsored links, but Pizza Hut doesn’t show up.

The situation is the same for the term “pizza pasta”, which is searched over 100,000 times a month in the U.S., but doesn’t include Pizza Hut on the front page of Google. This keyword seems like it would be particularly important, because Pizza Hut has been promoting their pasta dishes for some time now. It seems like, if you’re promoting pizza and pasta and “pizza pasta” is a term with a high search volume, it’d be important to rank for it (Domino’s seems to think so, they can at least be found in the sponsored links).

Each of the keywords above seems like it would be be a great opportunity to increase sales for Pizza Hut in the U.S., which is exactly what the company is struggling to do lately. Getting your brand out there with social media is great, but don’t forget about the other ways to gain brand exposure and increase sales with the Internet.

SEO is a powerful tool, and if Pizza Hut wants to increase sales they’ll need to learn that soon. It looks like some of their competitors have already figured that out.

How to Find Affordable SEO Packages

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

Affordable SEO

Search engine optimization can be a very effective way to market a business online, but it can also be expensive. With all of the different companies out there, how do you find affordable SEO packages that will work on the budget your company has? It might not be as difficult as you think, but there are some things to take into consideration to make sure you aren’t wasting money.

Don't Waste Money

Once you realize SEO is needed for your business, the first thing to find out is what kind of price range you can afford, and what is reasonable to expect. SEO companies can vary greatly in how much they’ll charge you, and it’s important to know what you’re spending before you decide to go with a company. Don’t assume you know what a company is going to charge you, make sure they let you know up front.

Another important area to look into is what they can offer your company. Are they going to promote your site through social media? Will they perform on-page optimization? link-building? There are many ways to optimize and promote and website, and it’s good to know how they plan to promote your company. Some companies give SEO a bad name by taking a client’s money and running without doing any work. SEOs that have examples or a demo to show you are more likely to do useful things that can benefit your company.

Website ROI

We offer a variety of different packages to our clients, and can meet the budget of almost any small business trying to find a way to be more successful online. We perform a variety of different tasks to make sure out clients get the results they’re looking for. If you’re interested in purchasing an SEO package, make sure to check us out.

Bing Visual Search vs. Google Fast Flip

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

Google Microsoft Cartoon

Whenever a major company introduces a product that could possibly compete with Google, you can bet Google’s going to make sure you hear about something interesting they’re working on as well.

It happened when Microsoft first announced Bing and Google made sure you knew Wave was in the works, and it happened again this week when Bing’s Visual Search was announced and Google brought up their Fast Flip news search.

Google Fast Flip

It seems like Google looks through everything they’re working on, they find the product most similar to what their competitor just released, and talk about it as soon as possible.

Visual Search and Fast Flip look very similar on first glance, but when you look a little deeper, they’re pretty different. When you first look at the two Web sites, they’re both a page full of images that you can click on to get more information, but the similarities stop there.

Fast Flip provides screen caps of articles on Web sites Google’s partners have released. Google already provides ways to introduce readers to news content, but they’re trying to make the experience more visual and magazine-like.

Bing's Visual Search

Bing’s Visual Search is much different. Bing isn’t trying to provide articles on partnered sites in a new way, instead it looks like they are trying to fill a need in search that no one has been successful doing yet. The Visual Search looks like it’s attempting to allow people to find things they’re looking for without knowing what the things are called.

If you’ve ever had something pictured in your head, knew what it looked like, but had no idea what the thing was called, Bing’s Visual Search might be the answer for that particular problem. Instead of having to type in words to find what you’re looking for, you’ll be able to click through images and have a search engine figure out what you’re looking for.

While Fast Flip feels like a novelty that doesn’t provide much value to a user, the Visual Search Bing is working on looks like it has real potential, and it needs to.

It’s good to see Bing coming out with new additions to the search engine, but it still has a long way to go before it’s a real competitor with Google. The Yahoo partnership and Visual Search are a good start, and they’ll need to keep it up to compete.